Discover
Coverage, honestly
What we have, where it came from, and — more usefully — where it is thin.
- 528
- places listed
- 19
- states
- 2
- open data sources
- 2026-08-15
- last synced
| State | Temples & Derasars | Sthanaks & Upashrays | Community Halls & Bhavans | Sadhu–Sadhvi Vihar & Darshan | Jain Bhojanshala & Restaurants | Dharamshalas & Tirth Stays | Tirth Yatra Guide | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gujarat | 148 | — | — | — | 1 | — | 3 | 152 |
| Maharashtra | 73 | 3 | 2 | — | 10 | — | 1 | 89 |
| Karnataka | 54 | — | 2 | — | 8 | — | — | 64 |
| Rajasthan | 38 | — | 1 | — | — | — | 4 | 43 |
| Jharkhand | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 39 |
| Madhya Pradesh | 37 | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | 38 |
| Tamil Nadu | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30 |
| Uttar Pradesh | 19 | 1 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 23 |
| Delhi | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 18 |
| Bihar | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9 |
| Punjab | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 |
| Kerala | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| West Bengal | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| Andhra Pradesh | 2 | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | 3 |
| Telangana | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| Assam | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| Goa | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| Haryana | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| Puducherry | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 |
Last synced 2026-08-15 · Place data: © OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL · Wikidata, CC0
The shape of the gap, stated plainly
This is not self-criticism. A visitor who sees an honest gap and a one-tap way to fill it becomes a contributor; a visitor who senses a directory pretending to be complete, and then fails to find their own temple, is gone for good.
Temples & Derasars
486
92%
Why it is thin
The one category open mapping does well. A derasar is a building with a name on a street, so a passing mapper can record it without knowing anything about Jainism — which is why we have hundreds of them and why most carry nothing but a name.
What would fix it
Not more records — better ones. Timings and a telephone number for the temples already listed, which only the trust holds.
Sthanaks & Upashrays
4
0.8%
Why it is thin
The starkest gap on the site, and it is structural rather than accidental. A sthanak is often an upper floor, a hall inside a housing society, or a room attached to a residence — it has no shopfront and no signboard a mapper would photograph. Nothing about it says "map me" to a stranger walking past.
What would fix it
One person at each sthanak, once. This is the single category where the community can add more in a month than any amount of research could in a year — nobody outside the sangh knows these exist.
Community Halls & Bhavans
5
0.9%
Why it is thin
Community halls and bhavans are usually recorded as somebody's address rather than as a public place, and many share a building with a derasar that is mapped instead. The hall exists; the map has no reason to know it is separately bookable.
What would fix it
A line from whoever takes the bookings — capacity, whether there is a kitchen, and who to ring.
Dharamshalas & Tirth Stays
1
0.2%
Why it is thin
A dharamshala is not a hotel and does not advertise like one. It takes bookings by telephone through a pedhi office, so it appears in no booking platform and on almost no map.
What would fix it
The pedhi office number and the booking rule, tirth by tirth. The tirth pages carry what we have and say plainly where we have nothing.
Jain Bhojanshala & Restaurants
20
3.8%
Why it is thin
Restaurants tagged as Jain food in open data are mostly commercial kitchens in large cities. The bhojanshala attached to a derasar, which is what a travelling family actually wants, is almost never tagged at all.
What would fix it
Bhojanshala timings from the trusts that run them — and confirmation of what the kitchen actually observes, which no dataset records.
Sadhu–Sadhvi Vihar & Darshan
0
0%
Why it is thin
Empty, and it always will be from open data — because it is not a fact about a building. Where sadhus and sadhvijis are staying changes with every vihar, and only the sangh hosting them knows. No map can hold this; a community can.
What would fix it
Institutions posting it themselves, which is an app feature and is not built. Until then this section will stay honestly empty rather than showing stale information about where a sadhu was last month.
Tirth Yatra Guide
12
2.3%
Why it is thin
The one category we did not leave to open data. The tirth kshetra pages were researched and written individually, which is why they are the deepest content on the site — and why there are only a few dozen of them.
What would fix it
Telephone numbers, mostly. Most tirths here have none, and that gap closes with phone calls rather than more web research.
Where these places are, when we know
Coverage by town rather than by state, because a state total of 89 hides that a district has three.
And here is the uncomfortable part: we can place only 145 of 528 records in a town at all. The remaining 383 carry a name, a state and coordinates, and nothing that tells you which place they belong to. A district-level table would be 96% blank, so this one is built on the towns we do have — and the blank is stated here instead of being hidden in a column.
| Town | State | Records | Need work | With a phone |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mumbai | Maharashtra | 16 | 13 | 3 |
| Bengaluru | Karnataka | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| Mehsana | Gujarat | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| Chhatarpur district | Madhya Pradesh | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Hassan district | Karnataka | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Pune | Maharashtra | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Shravanabelagola | Karnataka | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Delhi | Delhi | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Indore | Madhya Pradesh | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Jabalpur | Madhya Pradesh | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Jagraon | Punjab | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Kanchipuram district | Tamil Nadu | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Lakhnadon | Madhya Pradesh | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Malegaon | Maharashtra | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Naugama | Rajasthan | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Tamil Nadu | Tamil Nadu | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Tiruvannamalai | Tamil Nadu | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Tiruvannamalai district | Tamil Nadu | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Ward No. 15, Kolkata Municipal Corporation | West Bengal | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Aburaj | Rajasthan | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Agra | Uttar Pradesh | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| ahmedabad | Gujarat | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Ahmedabad | Gujarat | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Ajmer | Rajasthan | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Alwar district | Rajasthan | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| ambad | Maharashtra | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Ambesari | Maharashtra | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Ashoknagar | Madhya Pradesh | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Banaskantha district | Gujarat | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Barwani | Madhya Pradesh | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Bhadresar | Gujarat | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| bhagalpur | Bihar | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Bhavnagar district | Gujarat | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Bhilwara | Rajasthan | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| bhiwandi | Maharashtra | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Bikaner district | Rajasthan | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| budhana | Uttar Pradesh | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dakshina Kannada district | Karnataka | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dalla wali Road, Jagraon, Punjab, India | Punjab | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dhulian | West Bengal | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Nashik is the honest example
Chetan, who compiled the 2008 Nashik district directory by hand, counts roughly twenty sthanaks, twenty temples and five dharamshalas in Nashik. Open maps give us five places in the whole district. That is not a criticism of OpenStreetMap — nobody has mapped them yet. It is exactly why the form above exists.


